Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'free britney'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Discussions
    • Music News
    • Britney Spears
    • Entertainment
    • Politics & Global News
    • Fitness, Health & Lifestyle
    • LGBTQ+
    • Tech
    • General
    • Mental Health
  • Exhale
    • Announcements
    • Ask a question
    • Suggestions
    • Forum Support


  • Britney Spears
  • Camila Cabello
  • Creators
  • Hilary Duff
  • Justin Bieber
  • Katy Perry
  • Kesha
  • Lady Gaga
  • Madonna
  • Rihanna
  • Thirst Traps
  • Pussycat Dolls

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start




  1. Update: The following text that's crossed out is defamatory and false according to a demand letter from Lou Taylor: Courtney Love was almost placed in a conservatorship by the same people who put Britney Spears in one, and she says it nearly killed her. A user on Instagram asked: “Is it true that Lou Taylor – who planned the conservatorship for Britney with her father – wanted to put you in a conservatorship too?” Courtney replied, “Short answer is yes. Lou did try. for a mutated strain of a conservatorship. She and the ‘jeryls’ made an attempt to control kurts name and likeness and all nirvana songs (96 per cent). Then sell the publishing, by which time I’d be in a conservatorship or more likely? Dead.” “I was successful at blocking only Lou, that’s just because I chant a lot which makes me lucky. But, not her buddies. I just looked at Britney’s account. There’s no point in sticking my neck out for her now, her pack of wolves almost killed me and my only child,” she continued. Courtney added that Britney “looks damaged, fu**ed up for life.” Courtney had a platonic relationship with Britney's former manager Sam Lutfi for years as well. “I just got away from (Sam) lutfi after 8.5 hellish years. Bad as he is? He doesn’t hold a candle to those people,” Love said. “I’ve tried to lobby attorneys for years with a glimmer of humanity to take on Spears situation and they always p***y out,” she continued. “And frankly I’m done with it.” Courtney added she knows “more about the Spears case than almost anyone there is. There was a time I’d have told you anything. Everything”. “It’s one of the worst things I’ve ever seen done to another woman and trust me I’ve seen it all,” she continued. “But I’m OK now in Europe recovering from a near death illness that probably happened due to the stress of out maneuvering those ***holes for pre-Britney, 25 some years … we finally have a manager they’re all scared of and we are safe. I’m OK and most of all frances is OK. I’m not dragging us though the PTSD and trauma that Lou's name brings up in me.” She finished with: no one can do that to us again”. “In exchange for that security. I don’t get to talk about the particulars. I’m keeping the security. I’m sorry but I can’t help you further [email protected] Britney ‘expose’ was a lazy farce. If that’s all there is for justice? **** it. I’ll make my own government. And do as I’m told.” Related:
  2. I came across this video on YouTube highlighting some of Britney's top moments with the crowd during POM. I seen a few of them but majority I've never seen before. She looked like she was having such a good time and more than capable to take care of herself. #FreeBritney https://youtu.be/xLDVermnGNE (Sorry, sadly I can't figure out how to embed a YouTube video)
  3. I'm very concerned about what I heard at the end of the Britney's Gram latest podcast. First of all, I think those women do a great job for being thrown into something they had no clue they were getting into, but really dug into and now have really helped this movement move forward. The last podcast had a ton of great information, but most concerning was the medical professional who spoke as the anonymous interviewer. She had some amazing insight and I truly hope that one day Britney can be placed with someone like her to rehabilitate herself after her conservatorship ends. However, what she spoke about towards the end is very alarming. Perhaps she did have a mental condition from her 20s that caused her breakdown (but I believe it to be blamed mostly only the pressures of her extreme fame) the intense isolation from the conservatorship has only created, or exacerbated this. This woman literally explains that such isolation that Britney has been living in in general, plus living in a state of basically constant solitude during COVID-19, ongoing abuse by having her freedoms stripped away actually eats away at neurons and parts of the brain (she explains it in much better medical terms). People comment that something about Britney is off, and it's true... Her speech, mannerisms, voice, even movements have changed, especially once the pandemic started. And this can happen from not only being on prolonged medication but living the way Britney is. It was really shaking when she explained how Britney's own money is the one being used to strip her of her own freedom. We all knew that before, but when she broke it down the way she did she made a transparent argument towards this actually being an unlawful, abusive situation. The conservatorship is actually creating the environment it is supposed to protect her from - which is people taking advantage of her. And with that, it's causing a serious deterioration of her mental health.
  4. I know some of you have your reservations about supporting a single when Britney herself is refusing to perform or do any career work until her father is not involved in her finances, but there are a few points I believe we should consider: Previously Unreleased. This is not a newly written or recorded song, which means all production costs have already been expended. She’s already foot the bill for the song, there’s no harm in releasing. Bessemer Trust. They’ve been newly appointed as co-conservators so we should be optimistic that they will properly handle Britney’s finances and treat her fairly in this situation. When songs are released, typically the label is first to be paid and then they give artists their percentage. My thought process is that because this is how it’s always been, by supporting the song the label sees that Britney the artist is still being supported. (This applies to her music in general; maybe moreso than with “SITS” since it’s partnered with Urban Outfitters) and then when Britney is compensated, we continue to hope that Bessemer handles her finances in accordance. No need to promote. Britney can continue to not take on work projects and still receive support. We are her fans. We are the Britney Army. I understand not wanting to “feed the machine” that you feel is taking advantage of her, but you can support her music and fight for justice at the same time. Use this as a way to raise awareness while we trust the process that is going on now. She’s getting more and more victories in court. Ok I ranted quite a bit. This is all in my opinion and my interpretation of things. We can discuss EDIT: the simplest thing I’m trying to say in addition to that long drawn out post is that I think with Bessemer coming into this, it seems like Jamie is actually (although maybe slowly) getting removed from his position Related:
  5. We've been trying so hard to get the general public aware of the #FreeBritney movement and how Britney's team and conservators have been manipulating her, milking her for money, and the fact that she has no control over her own finances. After working so hard to get this trending, people then see us on social media organizing buying parties for Britney's music, and it's not even new music! We look like a clown of a fandom if we're going to say we and Britney hate the conservatorship, and then organize buying parties that directly put money into her conservator's and team's pockets Other fandoms, as well as the general public, are laughing at us. It makes us look like we don't even care. How are they supposed to take the movement seriously if Britney's own fans don't? And there's a difference between just streaming her music because you want to listen to it, and going out of your way to organize buying parties and re-purchasing songs you've owned for years. No one will take this movement seriously unless we continue to apply financial pressure on the conservatorship.
  6. Make-up artist Maxi asks fans to stop making conspiracy theories as they cause Britney stress and anguish. Maxi posted these comments on her Instagram story shortly after Sam posted a picture of Maxi on his story. Maxi continued to post #Freebritney I'm wondering if Britney was there too or if she wasn't able to get Jamie's approval. Maxi wrote: "Its #freebritney. Its not # create conspiracies to cause her stress and anguish." Maxi added: "The facts are bad enough already so there is no need for conspiracies."
  7. Hey Exhale, I recently had an interview with the amazing Sandra Song for Paper Magazine regarding the #FreeBritney movement. I'd love for you guys to check the full article out. 🙏 I'll copy + paste my quotes below for you as well. I hope I made you guys proud and that I articulated things in a way that shines a positive light on this ongoing situation. Let me know what you think. 🙏
  8. Photographer Ellen von Unwerth, the genius behind Britney's Blackout photoshoot, among many other iconic ones from every celebrity under the sun, re-posted a fan-edit with the hashtag #FreeBritney on it. It was a take on Madonna's American Life cover. Can we assume if she didn't support the #FreeBritney movement, she never would've posted this? Blackout 2 confirmed. Update: She posted about #FreeBritney again.
  9. Britney Spears wants a trust company of her and her legal advocate's choosing to handle her estate and replace her father Jamie as financial conservator. Mr. Spears is fighting this tooth and nail. He's attempting to insert Britney's former financial conservator, Andrew Wallet, back into play. Wallet mysteriously resigned last year after receiving a substantial raise in pay. According to new court docs, Mr. Spears confirms he does not want to change the structure of the conservatorship. Meaning, he wants to remain as Britney's financial conservator and not be replaced by the trust company that Britney wants. Just to double down: Britney does not want her father managing her money. The court docs state: "The cost of the Conservatorship of the Person alone, including medical, professional and other related costs, frequently exceeds $70,000 a month." Keep in mind, Britney is paying for this out of her own pocket. The docs also state Tri-Star wants to remain in control. Tri-Star is currently connected to Britney's business dealings. Britney's current business manager (not by choice) is a woman made Lou Taylor. She is strongly disliked in the Britney fandom because fans believe she is the mastermind pulling the strings, and Mr. Spears is the puppet. From the docs: "For the last ten years, Tri-Star Sports & Entertainment ("Tri Star") has been and continues to be an essential part of the team, including entertainment counsel, her manager, and publicity personnel." It continues: "The business manager Tri-Star has confirmed its confidence in Stonebridge." Fans suspect Stonebridge is mis-managing Britney's money and has close ties to Tri-Star. This would mean Britney's estate would be in the hands of people she is actively fighting against. The docs continue: "Additionally, several of [Britney's] Instagram posts have resulted in a general public alarm, and of course, Mr. Spears is deeply concerned." Related:
  10. This Billboard article made a timeline on how #FreeBritney started, it's progress, how far it went, and why it's still going on loud and strong. Here's what they said about BreatheHeavy: Congrats, @Jordan Miller!
  11. Britney Spears’ desire to expand her family is the driving force behind efforts to remove her father from her conservatorship. A close friend told The Sun: “Britney wants to have a bigger family and currently her set-up is not aligned for that in the way she wants.” “She always hoped to have a brood of kids and she wants to get in a place to independently start a new family.” “That goal for Britney is one of the driving factors in her efforts to change the set-up of the conservatorship. She wants more independence over her life decisions.” Sources say that Jamie wants his daughter to continue with her music and career, while she wants time away from the limelight. Pals claim that Britney would “love to have a couple of babies running around again” now that her sons Sean Preston and Jayden James are teenagers.” The source added: “Jamie and his daughter have endured times in their lives where they butted heads over different things.” Father Jamie banks close to $130,000 per year plus expenses to care for his daughter and oversee her $55 million dollar fortune. Full article: https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/12482095/britney-spears-dad-conservatorship-more-children/amp/
  12. Filed by counsel for Jamie Spears. Samuel Ingham is the current COA, and his recommendation will likely be the one that Judge Penny approves. Wallet is NOT Britney's lawyer, Sam Ingham's, recommendation. Britney will reportedly attend the next court hearing. 09/16/2020 at 9:30 AM in Probate Department 4 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Appointment Hearing - Conservator 09/16/2020 at 9:30 AM in Probate Department 4 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Motion Hearing
  13. yesterday a very strange account commented on some posts on @freebritneyla, which consisted on how crazy we are and how we are spreading negativity with the movement the curious thing is the way this person writes is basically identical as “britney's” for example: the three emojis, the flower 🌸 emoji, etc. i went to check this account and i found out they are posting stories ab britney’s posts, secret messages, very small size photos which are obviously hard to see and more... which is pretty contradictory of what they were commenting on free britney’s posts. people say is either britney or lou, but, if it’s lou then why would they post things “supporting” the movement? i don’t know how to post instagram accounts here so you’ll have to search for it but i promise they are weird af ps: the post where this account commented is on @freebritneyla post called “tri star protest”, you’ll found the comment above of everything.
  14. Britney Spears reportedly spent over $1,000,000 of her own money paying the lawyers handling her conservatorships, The Blast reports. Mind you, Britney has remained adamant about not wanting to be in a conservatorship since day one. Her brother recently confirmed so as well, saying "she's always wanted to get out of it." She's paying people to keep her in something she does not want to be in... let that sink in. A new filing highlights how much Britney's assets are worth, how her stocks did and the expenses of her private and professional conservatorships. The financial records say Britney spent a total of $1,202,503.30 on attorney fees and services in 2019. $400,000 of that were designated for "conservatee fees" charged by her own attorney, Sam Ingham. Another $346,000 was "conservator fees" charged by the attorneys working on the conservatorship. Britney's former co-conservator, Andrew Wallet, who abruptly quit last year after receiving a pay-raise, was paid $27,000. Britney's father Jamie took home $128,000. It's worth mentioning Mr. Spears lives full-time in Louisiana while Britney lives in Los Angeles. Related:
  15. Britney's older brother Bryan Spears gave an interview about Britney. In it, he touches on the conservatorship and the #FreeBritney movement. Bryan gave the interview from mom Lynne's Kentwood estate, Serenity. The full thing is out now. I don't know what to think. On the #FreeBritney movement: "I am aware of it. Just to see that kind of interest in people and our fans and in society... to care that much about her and everyone in this family... we truly appreciate it. It means a lot." What does #FreeBritney mean? "That I don't quite know what their meaning is. I don't follow it that well. I am aware that they feel like maybe she's being confined or held against her will in some capacity. I can't speak for them." "The women in this family are very very strong-minded and have their own opinion and they want to do what they want to do. As much as I admire that, as a guy, one of two guys in this entire family, it kind of sucks." On the conservatorship: "She's been in this thing for quite some time now. Obviously there was a need for it in the beginning, I assume everyone knows - the issues that were going on - they've made some changes. All we can do is hope for the best." "I think we got caught by surprise by it all. It's been a great thing for our family up until this point. We're hoping for the best." Bryan adds he's not sure how the conservatorship was initiated. It's very clear it was enacted by dad Jamie. How does Britney feel about it? "In the beginning it was hard. Any time you're going through struggles and having to make big adjustments... that is very difficult. What I think kind of got us all through it... all of us have been pretty close all these years, normal fights... nothing ever major... we kind of came together, and not everybody agreed with it. Everybody had their own opinion. But in the end I think we made the right choice. But how it proceeds from here... I don't know." "In general, I think [Jamie] has done the best he could given the situation he was put in." "As you know, with any family, one person might be on stage and doing this, but it's a sacrifice from everybody. Everybody's putting in, to some degree, a little bit to keep it going." Does Britney want the conservatorship to end? "I'm assuming... I can't speak for that... There's so much false press out there. I would assume like anybody would want to get out of the situation. Who wouldn't?" Do you talk to Britney? "We speak constantly. She's always wanted to get out of it. It's very frustrating to have... whether someone's coming in peace to help or they're coming in with an attitude. Having someone constantly tell you to do something has gotta be frustrating. So yeah, she's wanted to get out of it for quite some time." "I know what she wants, at the end of the day what is the reality of that?" Watch the full thing below:
  16. So guys I was wonder about Lynne's lawyers as now it is refered that she has her own legal team. So here you are all information I found! Gladstone N. Jones, III: Gladstone N. Jones, III, is the founding member and business manager of Jones, Swanson, Huddell & Garrison, LLC. He has served as lead counsel in litigation pending in New York, Florida, California, Mississippi, and Louisiana. In 2007, Jones was named one of the top 500 litigators in the United States. His practice focus is divided between complex commercial business disputes and toxic tort and environmental pollution matters involving landowners in the oil and gas industry. He has built a reputation in the legal community as a successful litigator and aggressive advocate. Because of his impressive background and reputation, Jones was approached by the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority – East to represent it in coastal land loss litigation that was ultimately filed in July of 2013 against ninety-seven oil and gas companies. Jones has been active in the Louisiana Association of Justice, has been an adjunct professor at Tulane University Law School in Toxic Torts, and is a regular speaker at various continuing legal education seminars. He serves on the Board of Trustees of Xavier University, a private historically black college in New Orleans. Jones graduated from Tulane Law School in 1992 after completing his undergraduate degree at Mississippi State University in 1987. He and his wife, Amanda, reside in New York City with their high school–age daughter. Gladstone N. Jones, III (“Glad”) is Jones Swanson’s founding member. In 25 years of practice, Glad has litigated both environmental and commercial cases in New York, Florida, California, Mississippi and Louisiana. He has garnered numerous honors for his work. Glad’s first major case, Friloux v. Exxon Corporation and Campbell Wells Corporation, in 1997, prompted changes in Louisiana’s rules concerning the handling and disposal of oilfield waste. Another one of his cases, Doré Energy v. Carter-Langham et al., resulted in what was then the largest land restoration judgment in Louisiana history—$57 million. In 2010, Glad was lead counsel on Active Solutions et al. v. Dell, Inc., et al., which not only resulted in a verdict against the technology giant Dell, but also set the stage for the later criminal conviction of then-New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin. In 2013, the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority–East hired Glad to bring a case against nearly 100 oil, gas and pipeline companies in what The New York Times called “the most ambitious environmental lawsuit ever.” The SLFPA–E case prompted private landowners throughout South Louisiana to bring their own land-loss cases, and Glad represents several of those plaintiffs today. In New Orleans, Glad serves on the boards of Xavier University and Stirling Properties. In New York City, he serves on the board of the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. He seems for me like a big fish lawyer maybe not so related to family law but in this high profile case his experience with big cases can be so useful and I think this is this lawyer Lynne got from Louisiana's governor with his and his wife help. Yasha Bronshteyn Yasha Bronshteyn has each been named by their peers for inclusion in the 2016-2020 Super Lawyers list. Each year, only five percent of lawyers throughout California are named by the research team to be a 'Super Lawyer'. Yasha Bronshteyn was recognized as 'Top Rated Estate & Trust Litigation Attorneys in Southern California.' Super Lawyers, part of Thomson Reuters, is a rating of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. Also, Recognized by US News Best Lawyers®. With decades of litigation experience Mr. Bronshteyn's practice focuses on complex estate and trust litigation, probate and trust administration, conservatorships, will contests, inter-generational family controversies, and complex family law matters. Mr. Bronshteyn is actively engaged in the Los Angeles County Bar Association (LACBA), as a member of the Executive Committee of the LACBA Trust & Estates Section. Representative Cases Defended owner of National Basketball Association in Probate Trial after spouse filed Petition for Approval of Team Sale without consent under Trust Provisions related to incompetence. Represented beneficiary in 9 day trial concerning issues such as Lack of Capacity, Undue Influence, Quiet Title, Independent Review, and Gifts to Caregivers. Represented Personal Representative at Trial based on Petition for Order Directing Conveyance of Property to Estate, Request for Double Damages and Punitive Damages. Represented sibling at trial on a highly contested conservatorship proceeding, with multiple competing petitioners. Represented co-conservators at trial on an accounting in contested conservatorship proceeding. Represented Conservator of the Person and Estate at trial. Conservator's theories of recovery were based on conversion of conservatee's real property, Elder abuse, and the power of the court to adjudicate an estate's claims against persons charged with embezzling, concealing, or otherwise wrongfully taking or retaining property belong to the estate. (Probate Code §850(a)(2)(D) & Probate Code §859). Represented spouse with complex dissolution given entertainment industry issues. A legal issue can affect everyone in the family - something that Yasha Bronshteyn knows well. As an attorney at Ginzburg & Bronshteyn, APC, he works with clients in Los Angeles County and across the state of California. Through his family law practice, Mr. Bronshteyn handles cases that involve child and spousal support, paternity, child custody and visitation, divorce and high net worth divorce, prenuptial agreements and the division of marital assets, and domestic violence restraining orders. He also represents clients in dispute resolution, real estate transactions, and estate planning and elder law issues such as the following: funding, incapacity, irrevocable trusts, elder abuse, conservatorships, guardianships, probate, litigation and administration. Chaired or second–chaired numerous contentious conservatorship trials and financial elder abuse, beneficiary disputes and disputes regarding the validity of wills and trusts and undue influence. Part of litigation and research team for the contentious billion dollar Sterling vs. Sterling Probate Matter in 2014. Extensive research and writing experience including but not limited to briefs, motions and other discovery practice. Extensive deposition experience both taking and defending. Also, handle mid- sized estate planning matters. Mr. Bronshteyn is able to work with clients to find the most effective solution for everyone in the family. While he is keen on protecting someone’s rights, he also understands the short- and long-term effects that these cases can have. He has the ability to look ahead and develop a plan that will best serve someone’s future. For his adherence to legal ethics and superior legal skills, Mr. Bronshteyn holds the highest peer rating possible of AV Preeminent* from Martindale-Hubbell. Specialize in litigation involving conservatorships, trusts, estates, financial elder abuse, and guardianships. Litigation experience in all aspects of trust and estate litigation and conservatorships from filing petitions, discovery, mediation, evidentiary hearings and appeals. Extensive probate and trust administration experience including subtrust funding, creditor’s claims, accountings, petitions confirming assets of the estate and/or trust. “AV” rating by peers - deemed to have very high professional ethics and preeminent legal ability. Only lawyers with the highest ethical standards and professional ability receive a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating. Chaired or second–chaired numerous contentious conservatorship trials and financial elder abuse, beneficiary disputes and disputes regarding the validity of wills and trusts and undue influence. Part of litigation and research team for the contentious billion dollar Sterling vs. Sterling Probate Matter in 2014. Extensive research and writing experience including but not limited to briefs, motions and other discovery practice. Extensive deposition experience both taking and defending. Also, handle mid- sized estate planning matters. Serve on the Probate Volunteer Panel of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Serve on panel as Court Appointed Counsel for Probate Department of the San Diego Superior Court. Licensed to practice law in all Courts of the State of California, the Federal Court for the Central District of California, the Federal Court Eastern District of California, the Federal Court Northern District of California, and the Federal Court Southern District of California. He seem a bit less high profile lawyer but with a great experience in family and conservatorship laws. This is 100% someone who is needed in Britney's case. In total it seems Lynne got big fishes to fight conservatorship and both lawyers fill each other perfectly if one lacks in some things second fills. And I am sure they are not cheap to hire... Go Lynne!
  17. TMZ posted a pro-conservatorship story today. In it, they claim that the permanent conservatorships Britney Spears was involuntarily placed under, the ones she tried fighting to get out of, are responsible for keeping her alive. Here's a copy + paste snippet of what they wrote: "Here's the reality. We've reported for the last 2 years ... Britney is struggling. Her meds stopped working and doctors were having trouble finding the right combination. Sources with direct knowledge tell us she's not been easy to deal with ... she sometimes complains she wants more freedom. Short story -- she hasn't been especially stable managing her mental illness." They also claim Britney doesn't see her kids as much because of her mental state. TMZ had this to say: "The conservatorship has been around for 12 years -- an incredibly unusual amount of time for a conservatorship to last, but this one's different." They add: "Our sources have said for years ... Britney's mental illness requires this conservatorship -- probably for life." TMZ denies Britney's father, Jamie Spears, who acts as the conservator over Britney's finances, is abusing his power. "There is a slew of people involved in the conservatorship -- doctors, lawyers, therapists and a judge. There is no way Jamie could go rogue without one of the others taking it to the judge." Finally, they claim a source close to Britney said this: "These people who are screaming for the conservatorship to end, well if that happened and she hurt herself or died 2 weeks after would these people utter a peep? No way."
  18. The energy behind the #FreeBritney movement is at an all-time high. Millions of people are demanding change for a perceived injustice happening before our very eyes to one of the most powerful pop icons of our generation. 12 years ago, Britney was involuntarily placed in personal and financial conservatorships that legally removed her rights to fundamental basic civil liberties, including hiring her own representation, choosing her doctors... even freely seeing who she wants, voting or driving. Yesterday, July 22nd, a court hearing took place in downtown LA to discuss the status of Britney's conservatorships. Britney was scheduled to appear via video conference, however she did not. What happened? Fans outside the court hearing began claiming they were told she never appeared due to a connection error. This inspired a wave of backlash because it prompted a very legitimate concern that Britney was being censored or purposefully blocked from speaking on the conservatorship, thus prolonging her undesirable situation further. Basically, fans felt she was once again being censored. However, a source close to the court hearing, who finds it important to create an honest dialogue with supporters, reveals to BreatheHeavy that the connection error story is untrue. What actually happened is that four individuals who originally joined the video call with the judge were ordered to exit the call before Britney signed on because the information is confidential. However, they ignored the judge's requests, likely in an effort to stumble upon sensitive information, and continued to pop in and out of the stream prior to Britney's virtual arrival. As a result, the judge delayed the hearing as it was imperative to keep what Britney had to say completely private. Before the conspiracy theories begin, I'd like to point out that I was not paid or swayed in any way. What I do want to emphasize is that this is an honest attempt at communicating the truth, which I think is something many of us find very valuable amidst all of the uncertainty. This is a positive step, and while I know this information will be scrutinized anyway, I'd like to remind you that I personally champion the notion of Britney gaining more independence. I also am an advocate for transparency regarding this sensitive subject (or at least, finding a balance), and I think this is an instance where that happened. There's a new court date scheduled for August 19th. Related:
  19. Facebook is flagging posts about #FreeBritney, as well as disabling the hashtag, and referencing a new article from USA Today as their source. The USA Today article attempts to de-legitimize the #FreeBritney movement. It's titled: Fact check: Britney Spears' 12-year-long conservatorship is not taking advantage of her You can read the full thing here. Since when is USA Today the one with all the answers? Is it censorship? This is legitimately sick.
  20. The protest outside the courthouse is getting media attention, I'll be posting notable developements and images here. Feel free to add/contribute. Love you guys #freebritney Update: It appears Britney was ~unable to connect to the court hearing~ and it's been delayed... However, her Instagram account was able to post a photo. Update: The connection error story is untrue. Read more about what happened at Britney's court hearing here. Related:
  21. A makeup artist who worked on the "Slumber Party" music video with Britney and Sam Asghari is speaking up. "Okay, so the reason that I posted Sam's reply to my #FreeBritney-post was that he's unable to speak for himself. He's under difficult limitations and can't express himself and that how he feels and I want people to know because I think it's sad that fans actually thinks that he has something to do with this conservatorship or the dad or getting paid somehow to control her, when he would never do that as a person. But besides that he loves her and they would be married right now if it wasn't for the conservatorship. I want to clear up a few other things. I did not do a makeup for Britney for the Slumber Party video, I worked with Sam. I have done four or five other Britney videos in the past, signed NDA's on all those jobs but I can still express myself. The first time I ever met Britney was on the NSYNC video actually, the "girlfriend" video. So I was able to see her before the conservatorship and after the conservatorship. And I've talked to her recently, briefly on the phone and I'm not claiming to be close to her or her family friend, it's just because I'm friends with Sam and she's sweet girl. She grabbed the phone and said the sweetest things in the earth which I will not reveal but I can tell you that the only time she's happy, is when Sam's there or her kids are there so any fan that wouldn't want him in her life or doesn't support the relationship must want her to be completely alone. He's the only good person in her life so that's why I'm putting this out, to fans to realize that he's a positive influence in her life. So hopefully today goes really well and although I signed an NDA, I can express myself and I will continue to express myself about it and because I love her, you know, I can't help it, she's the sweetest angel. Thank you, love you, bye" He deleted the videos from YouTube, but you can see them on Twitter "And now let's get to why there even is conservatorship. Like I said, I've met her before the conservatorship when she was free and happy and I've encountered her several times after the conservatorship when she's obviously absolutely miserable. Now, she shaved her head, she attacked the paparazzi and she accidentally exposed a part of her body. Celebrities nowadays intentionally exposes a part of their bodies, all the time and shaving your head is just an expression, you know, if anything, she was just trying to express herself at that point. And attacking a paparazzi is done by everyone. It's, you know, a natural reaction to people hounding you. The reason she was put in conservatorship was not to protect her health, it was only because of money. She supported the entire family. They thought she was on some downward spiral and wasn't going to be able to make money anymore. That was the only reason she was ever placed on a conservatorship and has been on prison for 12 years. The only place she can go or anything she can do, it's got to be work related or completely monitored. Like imagine being a prisoner with an ankle monitor bracelet and being monitored in every possible way. It's worse than that. So hopefully today goes well and I feel that it's gonna take a while to get her back on track even after this because all of the damage that they have done, but I know that she is ready and she's gonna do it if she gets the change. Another thing I wanted to say is that she does communicate with her fans through other secret little instagrams and stuff. She does let you guys know how she feels. I don't know if I was supposed to say that, if it falls under any NDA's I've signed *giggles* but... whatever"
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block