Jump to content

Lawyers for Britney seems...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Update: Lawyers for Britney seems to have deactivated their twitter account.  Hmmm....wonder why...  Let's always keep asking questions.  Asking questions politely is not attacking or taking sides.  I

Can someone ban LawyersForBritney's account on here already?    They are obviously not "FOR" Britney, but for Jamie... or at least change their account names to "LawyersForJamie"...  Be

I'm sorry but LFB really seem to be exposing themselves so much lately...something just does not sit right with me at all with all their actions as of late.

Not unless she somehow was able to say she wants it directly to us. As I’ve said before voluntary is a legal term. She may very well be required to “voluntarily” stay in the conservator ship to prevent XYZ from happening, or to keep XYZ continuing to happen. I can’t say one way or another at this point. But I do think she’s strong enough to handle **** with the conservatorship completely dissolved. Do any A list celebrities manage their finances and pay their bills and ****? No. They have teams of people around them. She needs good people around her. Just like every other star on the planet. Even if this was once in place to save her life (whatever that actually means), from the sidelines I don’t feel like she needs it. 

  • Love 6
Link to post
13 minutes ago, STJ said:

Can someone ban LawyersForBritney's account on here already? 

 

They are obviously not "FOR" Britney, but for Jamie... or at least change their account names to "LawyersForJamie"... 

Because this is not it. 

Nobody sane or mentally unwell would want to be placed under a conservatorship voluntarily, so LawyersForJamie can f.ck off. 

 

I don't want to be on the same forum as member(s) who are pro-conservatorship or conservatorship apologists. 

Even if you don’t agree with anything they do, they blatantly said they support Britney and want her free of the conservatorship, haven’t they? I never paid attention to any of the accounts until the drama started and I read there PSA and I wasn’t getting conservatorship support vibes from it. Maybe I’m lacking factual information…

Link to post
2 minutes ago, STJ said:

If they are truly FOR Britney, then they need to stop posting ******** tweets like, "What if britney wants to be in conservatorship"... because that is implying they are supporting conservatorships. Nobody wants to be in one, do you want to be in one? where you have 0 control over your life, your spending habits shown to the public every single year?

 

They are lawyers, are they not? Why do I have more brain cells than them?

Being objective, I think it sounds like they are asking a question and exploring ideas-trying to wrap their mind around how something so corrupt could go on for so long. The rest is connecting random dots and making assumptions on your or whoever’s end. I’m not for or against them; I don’t know enough. I’m just being rational and objective. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
  • Super Moderators
15 minutes ago, STJ said:

If they are truly FOR Britney, then they need to stop posting ******** tweets like, "What if britney wants to be in conservatorship"... because that is implying they are supporting conservatorships. Nobody wants to be in one, do you want to be in one? where you have 0 control over your life, your spending habits shown to the public every single year?

 

They are lawyers, are they not? Why do I have more brain cells than them?

because on court documents Sam Ingham said that the conservatorship was voluntary, though Britney had the freedom to terminate it in the future. They're not randomly "bringing up ideas".

Whether that's true or not, that's how it's being played on court, legally speaking, since Sam Ingham started to act like an actual lawyer last year.

 

I'm not saying that's right, even before this document was public, I had said many times in the past that even if at this point Britney is convinced she needs the conservatorship, or she's ok with it, it still doesn't make  it ok, because conservatorships aren't for that use, at least not for someone with Britney's capabilities. And I'm not defending Lawyersofbritney because I don't care about them, but ever since the drama started people have been acting as if this idea of Britney agreeing with the conservatoship once Jamie is gone comes out of nowhere, when it's literally there in one of the first documents that leaked last year.

If we're not going to believe that, then we shouldn't believe anything else that Ingham has said, like she wanting to remove her father, or her supporting the FreeBritney movement and the fans being informed of the process.

 

 

  • Love 2
  • Like 3

 I am a performer. I am a Mom. I am funny. I am your friend! I am Britney Jean

Link to post

why are we so quick to attack someone just bc they asked a question that differs from the usual narrative?

maybe they asked it bc of what Sam said about it being “voluntary”, or maybe they are just genuinely asking because some fans only want to push their narrative when we don’t know for sure if she wants the cship to stay and just wants Jamie out.

I’m getting tired of this stan war tbh. I’m not team LOB or BG i think both parties helped the movement. I don’t think this post by them necessarily means they’re team con, and the sudden allegations from BG on NYE weren’t backed up with any proof. 

  • Love 1
  • Like 2
Link to post
  • Super Moderators
2 hours ago, halfdressed said:

Not unless she somehow was able to say she wants it directly to us. As I’ve said before voluntary is a legal term. She may very well be required to “voluntarily” stay in the conservator ship to prevent XYZ from happening, or to keep XYZ continuing to happen. I can’t say one way or another at this point. But I do think she’s strong enough to handle **** with the conservatorship completely dissolved. Do any A list celebrities manage their finances and pay their bills and ****? No. They have teams of people around them. She needs good people around her. Just like every other star on the planet. Even if this was once in place to save her life (whatever that actually means), from the sidelines I don’t feel like she needs it. 

Honestly I feel other celebrities require more hand holding than her yet she ends up in a conservatorship. They spend their millions to basically make their lives easier yet Britney is doing the opposite at her expense. 

  • Love 6
Link to post

Lawyers for Britney are trash who have showed their hand multiple times. I’m thinking the account was taken over by someone else early last year when they had that little breakdown about her not saying anything herself in court and said they’d be leaving the movement and deactivated their account. They came back and didn’t even mention it. 

  • Love 7
Link to post
  • Exhale+

I'm not saying I support LFB but..

I do think we have to acknowledge that there is a chance Britney would be happy to remain under a conservatorship under HER PREFERRED TERMS with no colons involved 

 

  • Like 2

If there was a scale from one to ten then my love for you would be a million billion!

Link to post

I think they were only talking about the conservatorship of the state, not of the person. I would not find it strange if Britney wants a conservatorship of the state once she is free. I don't know if this can happen.

But if i am not mistaken, this would mean that she cannot be sued by a third party regarding her state and also if there are any problems with taxes it is not her responsibility. For example, i recall some soccer players were accused of tax evasion, even though they said their finances were managed by a third party. But they were brought to justice, had to testify, were sentenced by the judge. I think a conservatorship of the state could prevent that. But i am not 100% sure how it works in the US. I am only making assumptions.

Link to post

They’ve most definitely flipped the script and i feel like if Britney wanted to keep the cship in place in some form then that paperwork filed last year wouldn’t have said that Britney is doing such and such without waiving her right to terminate the cship. Yet that wording was in there, so clearly she wants the ability to terminate, I feel like Jamie is the main road block and removing him first will make terminating the whole thing easier.

She had finance/estate controllers BEFORE the cship and she can have that again, she doesn’t need this restrictive, court controlled thing just to keep her finances in check.

  • Love 7
  • Like 1
Link to post

What the hell is going is going on in their last few sentences trying to bash the fanbase - they've turned into a complete and utter mess.

  • Love 4

he used to sing me sweet melodies ♫

Link to post
  • Exhale+

How the hell can that even be legal ? If she doesn't need want personal conservatorship. She sure as hell doesn't need estate on just because she is bad at finances. Like wtf. 

50% of world population is bad with handling their finances.

I thought conservatorship were placed when someone is so mentally I'll that they are danger to themselves and others.

I can't stand lawyers for Britney.

They can quite frankly kiss my white lily Louisiana ***.

  • Love 4
  • Like 5
Link to post

Yall need to watch the movies, "Girl Interrupted", "Girl with the dragon tattoo" & "American Horror Story: Asylum" before saying anyone wants to be in a conservatorship...

 

As someone who has been held involuntarily at a mental institution before, I know how corrupted the judges and doctors are. All they want is bodies to fill up the bed so they can get $$. I was abused and forced to take medications against my will!

 

So I take this very personally, and I truly believe Britney and no one on this Earth would want to place themselves under a conservatorship where they can be forced to do anything at any time, including ***ual abuse, blackmails, threats etc. 

 

That's all I have to say regarding this matter, I hate you lawyersforjamie.

 

  • Love 7
  • Like 1
Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block