Jump to content

#FREEBRITNEY | Britney’s Gram Received Worrying Voicemail Regarding Britney


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1254

  • 1215

  • 1155

  • 1062

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I thought Britney's grandma had received a worrying voicemail 

Do you guys remember that blind item from August last year?  This permanent A list "singer" is rebelling in one of the only ways she can. She has been refusing to take her medication which has

Her case is a public case in California's public records. Ever since the beginning she has tried according to these official records to fight the conservatorship at least 7 times, but was denied by th

Posted Images

4 hours ago, annonymous said:

For real? You saying now that even her nosejob was forced by her team? :mcorangu:

This **** becoming really annoying now. 

15 minutes ago, rawbrit said:

:deadbanana:

insecurities, probably

1 hour ago, DayvinDazone said:

This is Exhale. All members here are part-time plastic surgeons, makeup artists, stylists & hairdressers. :jj:

I don't get it either, love. Her nose was the pinnacle of achievable physical perfection and she ruined it with one surgery.

She's still beautiful and iconic, but her old nose was her trademark and should have never been touched.

I noticed the difference immediately in the Work ***** video where her facial features looked sharper / more chiseled than usual. She's lost some of that round/soft charm her face used to have and her nose was a big part of that.

 

Well 2007 made her massively insecure, I think anyone-especially a woman- would be after that.

But yeah, even if she talked about her nose in the early 2000s, which she did a lot if there was no conservatorship she may not have done a lot of things such as record albums she didn't want to record, tour when she didn't want to tour or record or even get plastic surgery.

 

  • Like 4
Link to post
2 minutes ago, div said:

Guys how can we explain the video where Britney’s saying it’s all well if things were not? 

the devil team forcing her to do it ? I mean if they force to take drugs, force to enter a facility without her will , a little video ain't a big business for them .

  • Like 4
Link to post
3 hours ago, Meaner03 said:

 

OH! Since TMZ is everybody and every other fake medias THE source, i guess #FreeBritney is no longer a conspiracy , and we are not crazy fans anymore to the general GP. What happened for TMZ to turn the narrative in such a quick way ? did team cship forget to tip you ? did you get a more interesting offer from Britney's team ? 

Oh since they changed "camp" they should repost the video where they say Britney was never diagnosed bipolar

 

2 hours ago, baddicted said:

They haven’t changed. They still defend Jamie in their article. 

 

Maybe they weren't being paid but actually have a direct source from Britney's team (her father probably). And now they might have a second source from the people trying to end the cship, and that's why this is more like a neutral article. [Remember Britney never had a way of contacting the media herself and her whole team is hired by conservators and therefore are pro-cship]

Past articles would paint the free Britney movement as delusional but now it sounds more like a real thing. And they talk about the fact that Britney is saying she was sent to the mental facility against her will but Jamie doesn't have the power to do that. But if he does not have that power how can Britney be saying that? Like to determine what is against her will or not all it would take was her word right, so it sounds like one of them is lying and taking articles pretty much backed by her father he seems to be the more inconsistent one here. First it was Britney worried about her father's disease, then it was Britney almost dying without meds. At one point she was dismissing the movement and accusing Sam Lutfi of creating this whole drama but now she is pro-Free Britney. It just all points to her team not knowing exactly how to do damage control here as they watch the cship crumble. It's just sad that they can control everything and make it all look a little confusing and blurry. I'm sure if Britney could speak more directly through social media more people would join the movement (and maybe that's what she was asking the judge as in having more freedom). But hopefully more is going to get revealed as she gets untied.

  • Like 8
Link to post
43 minutes ago, chizwhiz said:

Yet we still do not know the circumstances of her health behind the supposed treatment. If someone was combative and a danger to themselves / others they can be held under a MH order for a period of assessment and if deemed unable to be sound of mind they can continue to be held. 

its important people remain impartial.  

Anything could be possible, I mean it’s telling that the court is completely sealed.

The documents being sealed don't mean nothing, people have been placed under cship without being diagnosed with sever mental illness , it happened in courts in California, i've posted videos about it .

 

What i don't get is why people go with the narrative "yeah but what if she is ill ect" and so what? is being mentally ill a crime, so big that every rights a human being living in a supposed democracy is given can be taken away. 

A f**king serial killer can hire a lawyer , a f**king pedophile can do it , but not Britney 

  • Like 9
Link to post
11 minutes ago, generation glory said:

Which makes me believe it’s TRUE Britney was involuntarily committed to treatment as far back as January just as the paralegal told Britney’s Gram. TMZ writes half truths mixed with lies. Andrew Wallet got the hell outta there because he saw the writing on the wall. The cship is a sinking ship. Andrew jumped off before the cship boat sank. Yes he got his $ first then said bye *******.

His money and career. He was pretty much no one before cship, now he is one of the top attorneys in LA. And he was only selected as a Super Lawyer after her cship.

 

https://profiles.superlawyers.com/california-southern/camarillo/lawyer/andrew-m-wallet/dc62a646-6249-45c9-a182-ea90273a82af.html

  • Like 6
Link to post
12 hours ago, PrinceAli89 said:

I just watched it last night too, I had tears in my eyes thinking of all the the elderly people going through that in Vegas. Also, thinking how this is happening to an extremely A-list celebrity right in front of our eyes. :crying4:

Guardianship is called Conservatorship in some states.  In others, there are both, meaning that Guardianship is over the person & Conservatorship is over the estate.  Depends on where you live.  BUT basically you can think of the two as  variations of the same.  If you really want to know what happens to the elderly and persons with disabilities in guardianships, please visit our organization and join us in the quest to end Guardianship and Conservatorship Abuse.  https://www.stopguardianabuse.org.     This org was started in 2008 by people whose parents ended up in Guardianships.    Please check out our legislation page and victims' page.  Also, go to www.facebook.com/boomersbeware.com.  Click on the notes section, and look under "Victim's stories" you'll find 450 cases showing how this travesty works, who does participates in it, and why.  There are horrific cases in all 50 states.  The Government Accountability Office has done studies on the abuses in guardianship, and they can be severe.  The problem  (in my opinion)  is that criminals have worked their way into the system.  It's too easy to become a guardian and nobody is monitoring the situation.  Everybody in the business, which has become a cottage industry profiting from anyone who is vulnerable, knows what they are doing.   In some states you just need a short course to pass and a high school education in order to control the entire life of another person.  Pretty tough if you happen to be a rocket scientist and are given a guardian with only a high school education.  Imagine if the "professional" assigned to control you had bankruptcies in the past.    Believe it or not, these people can slip into the system.  Plus some states don't require that CRIMINAL checks are done.  As of 2010, for example, the GOA reported that only 13 states required them.  Anyway, here's a recent case showing that anyone could have googled this guardian and found mug shots and wrap sheets. 

.

  • Like 8
Link to post
34 minutes ago, land said:

 

 

Maybe they weren't being paid but actually have a direct source from Britney's team (her father probably). And now they might have a second source from the people trying to end the cship, and that's why this is more like a neutral article. [Remember Britney never had a way of contacting the media herself and her whole team is hired by conservators and therefore are pro-cship]

Past articles would paint the free Britney movement as delusional but now it sounds more like a real thing. And they talk about the fact that Britney is saying she was sent to the mental facility against her will but Jamie doesn't have the power to do that. But if he does not have that power how can Britney be saying that? Like to determine what is against her will or not all it would take was her word right, so it sounds like one of them is lying and taking articles pretty much backed by her father he seems to be the more inconsistent one here. First it was Britney worried about her father's disease, then it was Britney almost dying without meds. At one point she was dismissing the movement and accusing Sam Lutfi of creating this whole drama but now she is pro-Free Britney. It just all points to her team not knowing exactly how to do damage control here as they watch the cship crumble. It's just sad that they can control everything and make it all look a little confusing and blurry. I'm sure if Britney could speak more directly through social media more people would join the movement (and maybe that's what she was asking the judge as in having more freedom). But hopefully more is going to get revealed as she gets untied.

As Conservator (Guardian in some states, or in others you have both) JAMIE HAS THE POWER TO:  take charge of Britney's accounts, have his own fees, taken out of Britney's accounts, approved by the court.  Same for all lawyers on the case representing EVERYBODY.  I.e. Britney even pays those arguing to keep her in Conservatorship. He has the power, if granted by the court, to put Britney in a lock-down facility.  This happens often to the elderly and persons with disabilities (mental illness issues, or even physical incapacities like deafness or breaking a hip. )  The guardian/conservator usually places the elder into a facility and sells their home and liquidates assets in the millions sometimes to pay for the guardianship.    People in this system are getting royally fleeced in many cases, and they are basically isolated with the family kept at bay by denying visitation to the elder. https://www.stopguardianabuse.org.  And https://www.facebook.com/boomersbeware

  • Like 5
Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block