Jump to content

MAKE ME ORIGINAL VIDEO HQ!!!


Recommended Posts

  • Deactivated
2 minutes ago, Crayboy said:

but still, imo this sexiness seems different from the one in MM Idk why that is, it comes off less authentic to me maybe. Can’t put my finger on it..

i can see that point

Link to post
  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It leaked! Edited by @breatheheavy: We have to remove the download links because of copyright. Sorry about that. 

Now leak the original Perfume, and my life will be complete 

Thanks B team...you know how to calm us all down for a while 

1 hour ago, Dark.Knight said:

The original MM video "is not ok"

---

But this is ok because "it's tasteful" and "it's iconic"

giphy.gifDismalBackBarnswallow-size_restricted.giEhGnqC.giftumblr_njason9O831qzdlkbo3_r1_400.gifK7Mc.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.giftumblr_p93iu3WNlz1qdcxoeo1_500.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.giftumblr_n9uz37PYQW1toi88co1_500.giftumblr_mcw4e7EWXk1qi0ofuo1_500.gif&key=56e4cca6bc15c0d6d4db11fd028f670c66030a628904fea636840347adea5a53original.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gifbritney-spears-make-me-+%25281%2529.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gif

giphy.gif77C53A4EAA1293CEA664E1110F6BFAEE9093CB88

original.gif

There’s a clear difference between Slave 4 U and Christina dancing in a thong in the Dirrty video.

There’s a level of class missing. Aside from the lack of CONCEPT.... which didn’t exist.

IT JUST DIDN’T WORK! -Larry Rudolph

  • Like 1
Link to post
3 hours ago, britneymegamix said:

Well, it's true. And it perfectly reflects Britney nowadays.

I feel like LaChapelle depicted the icon "Britney Spears" through her crucial stages: 

- 1999: The beginning. The infamous cover of Rolling Stones. It was so outrageous because she was very young and those pictures were ****. The primary reason of her success is been  indeed this aspect: Britney Spears was born as a controversial character, a lolita. 

- 2004: The middle. Everytime told us her drama. Too young (and perhaps not that into what she was doing) to sustain that huge success, she started to have enough of the "Hollywood" world. 3 years later, Britney Spears changed forever. 

- 2016: There are no more layers. If you see Make Me as a simple music video, then yes, it is gross and without any sense. But the singer is Britney Spears, a survivor who actually didn't really overcome all her problems; a "money machine" which  has continued to make music and money without any passion. She lives her life shallowly, she changed her face, she's been absorbed by a plastic system. David LaChapelle is not a random director, he couldn't ignore the fact that Britney Spears was another person.  The music video reflects  the emptiness of it.

 

That's why it is one of her best because it shows the real Britney Spears after the fall from grace. 

Uhh did you just say she’s shallow and vapid? How does that make the video good to expose her as a product with no substance?  Logic man... please use some

Link to post
1 hour ago, Dark.Knight said:

The original MM video "is not ok"

---

But this is ok because "it's tasteful" and "it's iconic"

giphy.gifDismalBackBarnswallow-size_restricted.giEhGnqC.giftumblr_njason9O831qzdlkbo3_r1_400.gifK7Mc.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.giftumblr_p93iu3WNlz1qdcxoeo1_500.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.giftumblr_n9uz37PYQW1toi88co1_500.giftumblr_mcw4e7EWXk1qi0ofuo1_500.gif&key=56e4cca6bc15c0d6d4db11fd028f670c66030a628904fea636840347adea5a53original.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gifbritney-spears-make-me-+%25281%2529.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gif

giphy.gif77C53A4EAA1293CEA664E1110F6BFAEE9093CB88

original.gif

And they say in those videos Britney is not showing her nipples so that is the reason they are classy and Make Me is trashy... Or that she looks sad and forced, so she wasn't forced to be more ****** being still an underage girl? Did you think that maybe she wasn't happy about it? because you all don't know a **** about it, maybe she was feeling super uncomfortable while filming Crazy or DLMBTLTK and you all are praising it... but it's ok beacuse she wasn't showing her nipples. I don't think that Britney was sad while filming those videos but if I want I can find kind of sad and uncomfortable faces in every Britney video and it doesn't mean anything so stop talking about the video like if you were there with Britney. Actually Britney is smiling and serving face in the original video, I can pick any music video from the Femme Fatale era where she looks 30 times (and years) more sad than  Make Me original video and you are comparing Hold It Against Me with this one... HIAM has an amazing concept but is the music video where she looks the saddest in my opinion.

  • Like 1
Link to post
  • Deactivated
33 minutes ago, colormefresh said:

There’s a clear difference between Slave 4 U and Christina dancing in a thong in the Dirrty video.

i don't see it

  • Like 1
Link to post
  • Deactivated
2 minutes ago, Jota del Toro said:

And they say in those videos Britney is not showing her nipples so that is the reason they are classy and Make Me is trashy... Or that she looks sad and forced, so she wasn't forced to be more ****** being still an underage girl? Did you think that maybe she wasn't happy about it? because you all don't know a **** about it, maybe she was feeling super uncomfortable while filming Crazy or DLMBTLTK and you all are praising it... but it's ok beacuse she wasn't showing her nipples. I don't think that Britney was sad while filming those videos but if I want I can find kind of sad and uncomfortable faces in every Britney video and it doesn't mean anything so stop talking about the video like if you were there with Britney. Actually Britney is smiling and serving face in the original video, I can pick any music video from the Femme Fatale era where she looks 30 times (and years) more sad than  Make Me original video and you are comparing Hold It Against Me with this one... HIAM has an amazing concept but is the music video where she looks the saddest in my opinion.

Remember when she was 35 and they made her do this? she was pissed

rs-23696-24344661-24344666-large.jpg?cro

  • Like 2
Link to post
8 minutes ago, Dark.Knight said:

Remember when she was 35 and they made her do this? she was pissed

rs-23696-24344661-24344666-large.jpg?cro

Exactly,  no fan said anything about it when she was 17 and the sexualized image was a real thing happening to her because is iconic... but you are complaining now that she's 37 because she looks forced? :wyd: where have you been the last 20 years? under a rock? 

  • Like 3
Link to post

Why the **** double Nicky Minaj *****? Don’t get it :imdying: britney doesn’t walk like a kardashian... no way... it was a joke this scene 

Britney body was so perfect... I don’t like the g eazy scene, no way, Britney the artist is *** but this one was too much for me (and for Britney as well apparently) I think here it was the **** double.. the rest of the video is great, she looks beautiful and her dance was good :clap:

  • Like 1
Link to post
26 minutes ago, Dark.Knight said:

Remember when she was 35 and they made her do this? she was pissed

rs-23696-24344661-24344666-large.jpg?cro

We learned the story behind this. She locked the door and told David to take these photos. She was 17.

As problematic as that was. David is a PHOTOGRAPHER. He isn’t a Joseph Kahn or a Francis Lawrence. He just shoots photos.

He needs to stay in his lane as a photographer. When’s the last time his name was even relevant? 2004, when he did the Everytime video? Exactly.

Link to post
5 minutes ago, colormefresh said:

We learned the story behind this. She locked the door and told David to take these photos. She was 17.

As problematic as that was. David is a PHOTOGRAPHER. Her isn’t a Joes

YOU WERE NOT THERE. stop talking as if you know her omg maybe that was what her team wanted you to know or maybe not but YOU DON'T KNOW.

  • Like 2
Link to post

God... I love some of you so much!  (For real)  Others...WOW.   Moms have all types of careers.  Other moms are actors & entertainers, too.  I guess WOMEN should just have girlie jobs like teaching lmao.  Make sure your knees are covered.  

I have no idea if I actually love it BUT I CANNOT STOP WATCHING THE COPY I HAVE.   

my copy has horrible sound.... someone help me?!  Idk how to PM ...

Thank God that there are no laughing girls and the weird auditioning guys for *** while my friends watch.   But dancing **** is worse.  

 

Also she looks beautiful throughout and there is a split second of her where she looks super beautiful and natural.   

 

Also OBVIOUSLY this is not a final edit.  Glad some of you realize that. 

 

Can people actually explain what you think classy and tacky means?

Xoxo.

13 hours ago, diegofs said:

Even unfinished and very very raw is one of her best videos 

It does have a storyline and makes sense, people should pay more attention to details when watching something 

Bad editing? it's unfair to say the video is bad because of its edition, it's just a video concept and 0 post production, so please, you can say the video is bad for any other reason, but not because of the editing 

G-eazy scene is really somewhat uncomfortable and I can't explain why, but people are overreacting about that, we all watch worse stuff 

His scene is by far the most random one there, so it's kinda meh

Pornographic? What do you really expect from a song saying MAKE ME OOH OOH OOH? Also, as if it was the first time Britney was "too ****" in a music video 

And I can't with people saying Britney looks uncomfortable. One of the reasons I was sad when it was scrapped was because how comfortable Britney looked in the leaked scenes back then

You guys just need to watch literally any of her videos since 2011 (excluding slumber party) and see how she really looks when uncomfortable shooting something 

She was fierce and serving sexuality, confidence, look and we all know she does enjoy doing that 

 

10 hours ago, Commotion said:

message me if u dont have it :) 

Idk how.   Help me. 

 

7 hours ago, Jota del Toro said:

Class is a 19 year old girl sweating simulating an orgy in a club? that's not my concept of  class but ok. It is classy now not back in the day, look it up.

NOBODY said the video had a concept I'm talking about the ****** image.

Stop trying to save Make Me official then, it didn't work and Glory flopped because of it. "It just didn't work has NEVER been so accurate".

:jj:

?

7 hours ago, Jota del Toro said:

Always the same bullshit, their mom is one of the best performers ever and they grew up around her, I highly doubt they are gonna be ashamed of her mother at this point (They can see worst things of Britney just by searching on google) and those kids are the most lucky kids in the world and they know it, they LOVE her. They are teens and her mom is an artist, an artist who owns her sexuality and likes to show it in her work. Madonna has kids as well and her kids are happy I don't see any trauma around them and Madonna is the most controversial woman in pop history.

Slumber Party is less ****** ok...so? She is laying on a couch with a young woman doing some lesbian gimmicks and licking milk from a table by the way... But it is classy because you can't see a female nipple? :mhm:

 

?

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
50 minutes ago, Scrappy said:

Uhh did you just say she’s shallow and vapid? How does that make the video good to expose her as a product with no substance?  Logic man... please use some

I think I can understand what he meant. I don't think he meant she's shallow. But it could be David's interpretation of Britney's current state.

The video breaks the 4th wall by the moment she stops the coreography during the "basement" scene and we see her thanking the staff. We see her as Britney, the professional, leaving a set with this dancer she was making out before recording the video - there's a staff member telling her to stop her kissing session to record the video. After the video is shot, she leaves. She goes to this house and sees an eviction note. When she enters this house, she's wearing gold, out of the sudden, and the dancers are there.

They are working out, she's putting on some lipstick, we see her pouring milk to a leopard... I mean, there's a lot of symbolism that is hard to read by just seeing this uncut version. What I mean is that this video has some sort of meaning we are not being able to get from only watching these scenes. There's some criticism about vanity or something. There's definitely a deeper concept -  the fact it was not released officially says a lot. She was not happy about something. We don't know what it is that she was not happy about. It might not even be the ****** part, considering her VMA performance and Slumber Party. But there's definitely some elements that can lead one to believe the video is deeper than what it is, considering La Chapelle's previous work.

All I know I feel some parts of the video don't look nice or as aesthetically interesting to watch as Slave. But there's definitely something going on, similar to If U Seek Amy, where we can feel there's something darker happening in the video.

  • Like 1
Link to post

They need to stop depending so much on sponsor and spend a little bit of their money on her videos

It's just insane how they focused on that gym in both videos, probably they had to create a crazy plot just to fit that gym in both versions - i'm pretty sure theyre the ones we should blame for scrapping the video

there's NO WAY britney team would waste so much money if someone from outside wasnt involved on this mess

I'm sure they rather give us a non sense (not saying make me original is non sense) video than just throwing it away 

  • Like 2
Link to post
  • Deactivated
58 minutes ago, Jota del Toro said:

Exactly,  no fan said anything about it when she was 17 and the sexualized image was a real thing happening to her because is iconic... but you are complaining now that she's 37 because she looks forced? :wyd: where have you been the last 20 years? under a rock? 

Remember when she wanted to cover herself up because of her sons being older, and they made her do some adjustments?

kids-choice-britney-spears-10617600-640-

  • Like 1
Link to post

Before i considered it was her father's fault, but I think by the time he sees britney almost having *** with the floor while shooting he would stop everything during on that time, so for i think it was that gym that didnt like how their brand was represented on the video

we all know how overprotected he is so dont come at me, he would make britney stop that video if he had any problem with that 

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block