Britney's Miss Movin On

Hilary Duff Just Basically Ruined My Weekend

Britney's Dad Bought Incriminating David Lucado Tape

Madonna Blasts Lady Gaga In New Song, Not In The Good Way

Listen To Maroon 5 & Gwen Stefani's "My Heart Is Open"

Paparazzo “Beaten” & “Held Hostage” At Montage Last Night

Shit went dowwwn. Fortunately, Britney wasn’t a part of it.

Britney was spotted at the Montage Hotel again last night, and where there’s Britney, there’s paparazzi. One photog, according to his agency’s site x17online.com, was “beaten” and “held hostage” by Montage Hotel security.

The paparazzo reportedly left his camera behind to check out the inside of the Montage Hotel. Soon after, there was an altercation, saying “hotel security pulled him [the photog] aside and asked what he was doing. He told him he was simply checking out the hotel. The two men pulled the photog into a room and proceeded to beat him!”

quote:

“I was attacked by hotel security and kept in a little room for over an hour and my phone was taken away from me when I tried to dial 911. They beat me up and refused to call the paramedics, saying that I was okay. One hour later I heard that there was a cop outside and I screamed to him for help.”

The Montage Hotel’s manager on duty told X17online he would not comment on the incident.

All in a day’s work to get a shot of the biggest star in the world. Click to stream:



Source: x17online.com

The Parents Television Council Warns Parents About “If U Seek Amy”

I don’t know about you, but when I think of ~Amy,~ I think of Britney’s alter ego with the pink wig. This is completely irrelevant to the story; just thought I’d put that out there.




More drama unfolds concerning this damn song title!

According to new reports, “The Parents Television Council is warning parents about the Britney Spears song “If U Seek Amy” and urging radio stations not to broadcast it because the nonprofit organization believes it “would violate the broadcast indecency law” if aired between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.”

First of all, how does a television council have any say what the RADIO plays.

“There is no misinterpreting the lyrics to this song, and it’s certainly not about a girl named Amy,” PTC president Tim Winter said of the track, the third single from Britney’s latest album, Circus.

“It’s one thing for a song with these lyrics to be included on a CD so that fans who wish to hear it can do so, but it’s an entirely different matter when this song is played over the publicly-owned airwaves, especially at a time when children are likely to be in the listening audience,” Winter says.

Fortunately, this hasn’t stopped radio from playing the track! According to MSNBC, “Six top 40 stations have the song in rotation this week, enough to place the track at No. 92 on the Billboard Pop 100 chart. Leading the pack is WFLZ-Tampa, Fla., which has played it 19 times.”

Not to mention the handful of emails I’ve received from fans in major cities like L.A. and New York saying their radio stations have been playing the uncensored version of “If U Seek Amy.”

“‘We’re confident the version of the song we air is not crossing any lines,’ program director Tommy Chuck told Billboard.com, adding that WFLX plays a Jive-created edit of the song that changes ‘Seek’ to ‘See’ as well as a jokey version in which morning host MJ shouts his name every time the word ‘Amy’ appears.

Digitally, ‘Amy’ has sold 107,000 copies in the United States, according to Nielsen SoundScan.”

Dear The Parents Television Council,
F-U-C-K ME.
Love,
BreatheHeavy.com

Unusual You for single #4!

January 21 – Kevin Picks Up The Boys From Britney’s



“OMG this is a Britney Spears site I don’t want to read about Kevin Federliiiiiiiine!”

Shush!

Check out K-fed picking up Brit’s boys from her home in Calabasas Wednesday evening. Look at Jayden chillaxing back there with his pacifier – damn cute.

And golf bowling claps for Kevin; looks like he lost some of the Holiday lbs!

Image: x17online.com

Conservatorship Instated On 81 Year Old Alzheimer’s Victim Actor Peter Falk. But Why Britney?



If you don’t like the conservatorship topic, quit reading.

Actor Peter Falk, 81, is currently held under a conservatorship by his adopted daughter Catherine Falk, who, according to recently filed court documents, claims her father is “no longer able take care of himself due to deteriorating health,” and claims her adoptive father “requires full-time custodial care for his health and safety.”

Peter Falk, who reportedly suffers from Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, must now endure a drawn-out legal battle between his daughter Catherine and wife of 32 years Shera Danese Falk, who filed opposition papers on Tuesday, January 20, in the Los Angeles Superior Court claiming Catherine “never had a good relationship with him.”

Sound familiar?

According to the Dailynews.com, daughter Catherine Falk is “worried the actor ‘can easily be deceived into transferring away property’ and believes a conservatorship will protect Peter from ‘fraud or undue influence.’”

Sounding really familiar?

Wife Shera Falk is against the idea of a conservatorship, claiming there is not enough evidence to prove that Peter Falk is in need of a conservatorship, saying: “Catherine is unable to prove by clear and convincing evidence that a conservatorship is the least restrictive means necessary to protect Peter.

[The court] ‘need not take the drastic step of taking away Peter’s rights under the guise of a conservatorship.’

This poor man is in a tug-of-war between his daughter and wife over the rights to his multi-million dollar fortune. He is 81 years old. He literally cannot take care of himself because he suffers from Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.

SO WHY IS BRITNEY SPEARS STILL UNDER A CONSERVATORSHIP???

Because it’s the only way they can force themselves back in her life. Her dad makes $16 THOUSAND dollars a MONTH to baby-sit a 27-year-old mother of two, who is fully capable of performing and touring around the world, but is “unable properly to provide for his or her personal needs for physical health, food, clothing, or shelter,” as the court documents state.

And if you recall, Britney DID object the conservatorship back in February when she consulted with attorney Adam Streisand, who was later mysteriously fired by the newly-appointed conservator Jamie Spears.

This girl is trapped. Why is NO ONE speaking out? Is a paycheck really worth the imprisonment of the biggest star in the world? Can’t you guys see what they’re doing is wrong???

Or is your precious comeback more important than her freedom.