Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ellshells

Article About Britney Photoshopped On French Website

66 posts in this topic

An article just came out on a french website. I used google translator for a translation, so excuse me if something is wrong. Anyway, they're talking about the release of the non photoshopped images of her marie claire shoot, which did not even happen. It's the cosmopolitan shoot and the 'marie claire' cover is fake.. It even says 2008 or something while this is a 2010 photoshoot. my god I can't.

:icanttt:

2efhn48.png

Britney Spears photoshoped for Marie Claire cover

Posted 14th of august 2012

When the photos of Britney Spears on the cover of Marie Claire were released without Photoshop, you're never safe from a scandal. Britney uses and abuses of Photoshop, the time to accept her image is perhaps time for Brit?

New Photoshop scandal for Britney Spears. The Marie Claire cover of Britney without Photoshop was unveiled and the result is disturbing. Unlike Lais Ribeiro victim of Photoshop, Britney is saved by the software fix. Wrinkles, dull skin and fearful expression, where is the Britney of our memories? Seeing the first photo, we first thought it was a joke, as Britney Spears's face was unrecognizable. Just as she enters her thirties, Britney actually looks ten or fifteen years older. We had big doubts about the authenticity of these pictures as Britney remains for us the idol of our youth. But looking at recent pictures of her at concerts and other photoshoots, she does not look good. It is therefore necessary to mourn the old Britney and accept her new face. A few days ago, we posed the question whether the photoshopped stars we were selling fantasy, Britney Spears gives us the answer. With these pictures, we don't need to doubt about this, we now know that stars are people like us and that once the lights and the cameras turned off, there remains no glamour. Photos of Britney Spears without photoshop shock us as it seems to be another person. Yet this is not the first time that Britney is accused of abuse to use Photoshop, but each time the darling of America is forgiven and quickly forgotten the incident.

One may wonder what happened to Britney Spears, the idol of our childhood iof whom we adored the looks and copied the choreography of? To believe that Britney is no longer a mirage. With previous years, her two pregnancies and its disorders, it is not surprising that she is marked by time. However, Britney seems to return to the front of the stage, as the new jury member X-Factor. Personal side, Britney Spears became Cleopatra to Fantasy Twist through the magic of Photoshop you can imagine! Still, Britney remains favorite in our hearts.

Source: http://www.meltyfash...re-a124180.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that is such an unflattering pic of britney, she looks about 50.

the whole shoot was just unflattering.

bad lighting + really bad hair / make up.

:mhm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no way that the first pic is the not photoshopped one. She looks like 60 she look way worst then fft

Unfortunately, it's not touched at all, i have the 400+ raw files from the same shoot

:mhm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the hell would they have her pose like that? I know they were going for fierce or whatever but seriously, Britney has the best smile in Hollywood, why would they settle for a fug pic like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:yawnn:

1.) Every bitch out there uses photoshop.

2.) She's one of the few to intentionally release photos that haven't been photoshopped to raise awareness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Britney did a Marie Claire shoot in 2010? :O

#FlopFan

No, it's the horrible, haunted Cosmopolitan shoot from 2010. they just used one of the pics for their cover.

I wish that shoot would've never existed tbh. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And that's not even the worst photo out of that bunch :mhm:

It's definitely one of them.

Lets not forget there is 400+ photos for that shoot.

:mhm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

are you sure that covers real cos i've looked it up and theirs no photos of a marie claire 2010 cover? it looks too photoshopped to be real!

omg you're right, look in the corner, the date says July 2008, and the picture's weren't taken in 2010 so yeah it must be fan made.

:mhm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's definitely one of them.

Lets not forget there is 400+ photos for that shoot.

:mhm:

I know, and loads are as bad as this one :mhm:

But I kinda secretly love practicing photoshop on them :shhh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol you have this from the telegraaf right?

it's sad how they always put her down with things like this :crying3:

Haha ja dat klopt. Het hele artikel is zo'n onzin. Het is niet eens die shoot.. :wtfff:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0